One of the greatest challenges is to argue on behalf of a cause you do not believe in. Such is the everyday life of the defense attorney. Yet the task itself holds an intellectual attraction. This week we defend the indefensible, and ask the reader to wonder whether the mantra “who are we to judge” holds a universal value or whether it is merely a superficial saying we place on a bumper sticker to make us look cool. Are you up for this challenge? If so, read this week’s Carosa Commentary “God and Calhoun at Yale.”
Related Articles
-
Which Way To The After-Party?
Here’s an idea. Keep doing things the same way forever, even when the playing field changes. The sweet truth...
-
Abandon All Bond, Ye Who Enter Here
The problem with all businesses is that don’t know when enough is enough. But more on that later. For...
-
A Bothersome Burden Has Just Been Lifted From My Shoulders, Did You Just Get the Same Feeling?
It’s the simple things in life that, once removed, bring greater understanding to what we value. When we reflect,...
-
‘The Coming Thing…’ Thoughts on Turning 60
Can you feel it? It’s there. You know it. Right beyond the bend. Right over the hill ahead. Can...
-
A Look Back at Tomorrow: A Review of the New Book Campusland
It used to be dystopian fiction was merely fiction. That was then. Today, it hits awfully too close to...
-
Why It’s Important You Have A High Need For Achievement
You decide what race you’ll run. It’s only natural to want to win that race. A mere participation trophy...
-
5 Reasons Why Splitting From New York Would be a Bonanza for Greater Western New York
There’s a very active discussion going on in Albany right now. It can directly impact your future and the...
-
Style or Substance? A Real-World Lesson (Part I)
Sometimes you’re given a plum position you never asked for. Mostly because you don’t know the plumness of the...
